What is on my mind is the Tsunami of utterly sick comments on "Social Media" especially in replies of sickos to the massacre at Bondi Beach in Australia.
I am especailly sickened by the wide spread "conspiracy" posts attempting to "deflect" from the cause and the ethnicity of the real murderers was.I am also amazed that in this day in age, with all the methods available to "Western Intelligence Agencies" (an Oxymoron) to identify terrorists. That they are in limited and blind folded by politicians to NOT do what "Intelligence Agencies " are meant to do by the assumed fact - to win the "hearts and minds" of Moslem voters. That "Islam is the religion of peace" and to oppose this is considered the heinous crime of "Islamaphobia".
And I see gross comments stating:
And I see gross comments stating:
"Oh Palestine will be free from zio-nazi colonization, it was foretold. It’s only a matter of time."How to reply to those who write phrase "zio-nazi"?
"It takes a special type of ignoranus to write the phrase "zio-nazi", since Nazism is based on "Aryan" racial supremacy (which Arabs fail in) and the belief that Jews are "Aryan" - "European colonizers" which Jews are most definately NOT. (as indicated in many DNA tests by recognized geneticists)
To accuse Jews of being Nazis, which saw Jews as "sub-human" (Untermenschen), relays an expression of the deep sense of historical humiliation or modern-day dehumanization of the "Arabs of the Mandated Areas" by the Dhimmi Jews in the self-castration of the "Great Nachba" of 1948. (The loss-read defeat- of the Arabs to exterminate the Jews after the 1947 UN "Partion vote")
On the otherhand Zionism, is a form of nationalism based on the right of self-determination, which relays the historically documetnted truthh that the Jewish People are truly the indigenous inhabitants of Eretz Yisrael - Al-Ard Al-Muqaddasah—The Holy Land and not the Arab / Moslem usurpers "colonizers".
What is absolutely true in this accusation is that the "wanabee" losers of the "Great Nachba" the Arab / Moslems, exceed at being "Usurpers" in their vain attempts to revise history with their "false narrrative".
Mohammad and his armies slaughtered "genocided" Jewish clans who refused to become his subjects.
The full -original- version of the chant was; "Khaybar Khaybar Ya Yahud, Jaish Muhammad Sa-ya'ud" (Khaybar, Khaybar, O Jews, the army of Muhammad will return)
The prominent Jewish tribes and clans involved in the battle and the preceding events were:
1. The Banu Nadir
This was the most significant tribe at Khaybar during the battle. They were originally one of the three major Jewish tribes of Medina. After being expelled from Medina in 625 CE (due to a conflict over a failed assassination plot and a breach of the Charter of Medina), many of their leaders and families moved to the oasis of Khaybar.
Key Leaders: Huyay ibn Akhtab (the chief, who was killed during the earlier siege of the Banu Qurayza) and his successor Kinana ibn al-Rabi' (who was killed at Khaybar).
2. The Banu Qaynuqa
Like the Banu Nadir, this tribe had also been expelled from Medina earlier (in 624 CE) following a market dispute and a siege. While many migrated to Syria, some segments of the tribe were present or allied with the Jewish community at Khaybar.
3. Local Khaybarite Clans
Khaybar was a confederation of several fortified settlements, each held by different families or sub-clans. Notable figures included:
- Marhab ibn al-Harith: A famous warrior and leader of one of the Khaybarite forts (the Fort of Na'im).
- Sallam ibn Mishkam: A leader who organized the defense of the Al-Natat region of the oasis.
While the chant is often used today as a threat of the total eradication and destruction of Israel, the historical outcome of the battle was more complex than a "genocide" as historical records (including Ibn Ishaq) list the casualties as approximately 93 Jews and 15-18 Muslims killed in the fighting.
The Treaty:
The battle ended not with a total slaughter, but with a surrender treaty.
The Jewish inhabitants of Khaybar requested to stay on their land to continue farming. Muhammad agreed, allowing them to remain as Dhimmis (protected subjects) on the condition that they give half of their annual harvest (dates) to the Muslim state.
The Jewish inhabitants remained in Khaybar until the reign of the second Caliph, Umar ibn al-Khattab (roughly 641 CE), who expelled them to Syria and Iraq, citing a deathbed wish of the Prophet that only one religion should remain in the Hejaz (the Arabian Peninsula).
Why the Chant is Controversial?
In a modern context, Islamic terrorist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah and their "useful idiot" supporters, use the chant to invoke the memory of a Jewish defeat.
The chant references a historical battle where Jews were defeated and eventually displaced, a reflection of the Islamic terrorist aspiration to the eradication of Israel today.
It has been categorized by organizations like the ADL and the AJC as an antisemitic slur that threatens collective violence.
The Jewish inhabitants remained in Khaybar until the reign of the second Caliph, Umar ibn al-Khattab (roughly 641 CE), who expelled them to Syria and Iraq, citing a deathbed wish of the Prophet that only one religion should remain in the Hejaz (the Arabian Peninsula).
Why the Chant is Controversial?
In a modern context, Islamic terrorist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah and their "useful idiot" supporters, use the chant to invoke the memory of a Jewish defeat.
The chant references a historical battle where Jews were defeated and eventually displaced, a reflection of the Islamic terrorist aspiration to the eradication of Israel today.
It has been categorized by organizations like the ADL and the AJC as an antisemitic slur that threatens collective violence.
No comments:
Post a Comment