This was originally a post of mine of Facebook from Augusy 11th, 2019 which because of its imprtance and length I decided to turn into a Blog entry.
What is on my mind today is the discussion regarding
California’s proposed new ethnic studies curriculum.
As an educator of more than 30 years’ experience I
understand that any ethnic studies courses will not have any chance of
succeeding if they don’t stem from a strong curriculum that challenges students
to read, listen, gather facts, analyze those facts and think critically about
the controversial issues that will naturally arise. I totally agree that as an
educator one should imbue students with an understanding of their own history
and that of others because history has for too long been told by the winners,
who have often left out the unsavory and sometimes tragic aspects of the story.
Regarding the source of those who proposed this "new
ethnic studies curriculum" in California I would insist that the teachers
who will teach this "New curriculum" be pre-screened for their
personal bias!
Furthermore, as a senior teacher, I would strictly supervise
those teachers in my responsibility to make them aware of their actions and to
NOT allow personal prejudice affect there prodigies! Education is just that to
make students aware and to open their minds to the facts and not to be
brainwashed by scrupulous individuals with an agenda.
I have absolutely no objection to any properly researched
educational course that broadens students’ thinking about; race, gender,
sexuality, history and power by educators trained in the material.
From past experience with "proposed ethnic studies
curriculum", many times they felt like an exercise in brainwashing to enforce
groupthink. If not monitored properly they can be cynically designed to
proselytize and inculcate more than to inform and to open minds without
critical thinking. Thereby, only offering one side and one side only -without
debate or criticism.
There is no mention in this new propose California ethnic
studies curriculum regarding those students who might wish to disagree.
In the "new" ethnic studies curriculum there’s a
"suggested list" of social movements that students might research —
that feels awfully one-sided. According to the authors of the "new ethnic
studies curriculum" there’s nothing wrong with students studying the Black
Panther Party or the Third World Liberation Front or the Occupy Movement or the
Palestinian-led BDS movement (?!!)
Not many educated teachers are aware of the true facts that
these reactionary movements were founded by the KGB in the early 1960's during
the "Cold War" to destabilize the American society from within? (I
refer you to the mention of this by Ion Mihai Pacepa, former acting chief of
Communist Romania’s espionage the highest-ranking intelligence officer ever to
have defected from the former Soviet bloc, in his book "Red Horizons"
(1987) and "Looming Disaster” by Lt. Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa and Prof. Ronald Rychlak (2016).)
How many know that the Workers World Party (WWP), read Antifa - was created by the KGB in 1957 with the initial task of helping the Kremlin create a favorable impression of the 1956 Soviet invasion of Hungary among the trade unions and “colored” population of the United States.
How many know that the Workers World Party (WWP), read Antifa - was created by the KGB in 1957 with the initial task of helping the Kremlin create a favorable impression of the 1956 Soviet invasion of Hungary among the trade unions and “colored” population of the United States.
How many know that the WWP presented itself as a “national
Marxist-Leninist party promoting socialism, supporting working class struggles
and lesbian/gay/bi/trans liberation, organizing protests, and denouncing racism
and sexism.” - Does THIS sound similar?
And what about the infamous Occupy Wall Street (OWS)
movement, which had Marxist roots and had been promoted by the international
communist movement?
Iran’s Ayatollah predicted that Occupy Wall Street (OWS)
would “bring down the capitalist system.” The Communist Party USA held a
national teleconference to endorse the Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement. “The
bourgeoisie won’t go without violent means,” a CPUSA speaker announced. “Long
live the Revolution!” The OWS movement has openly advocated for the abolition
of “capitalist America.”
The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement, is a tool used by
communists for their own benefit. Many observers have noted “Revcom.us” on
pre-printed signs at BLM events. Revcom stands for the Revolutionary Communist
Party. Its web page purports to support the Black Lives Matter movement.
And you wish to have naive young minds being fed this by
these brainwashed and duped teachers who have no idea of the background of the
super-secret KGB discipline known as the “science” of dezinformatsiya!
I ask what happened to the study of a range of ideas,
reflecting a variety of ideologies and perspectives, and having students take
sides, dispute and debate those ideas, honing their research and thinking in
the process, and ultimately deciding for themselves?
This "new" California curriculum feels like it is
more about imposing predigested political views on students rather than about
widening their perspectives.
The "new" model curriculum "compares"
capitalism with white supremacy? Wait? Have there NOT been many very many successful
Afro-America entrepreneurs?
In historical reference since the founding of the American
republic, it adopted the laissez-faire capitalism which has allowed for all
Americans to achieve better lives then their predecessors in "the old world".
Capitalism despite its flaws and detractors has led to better lives. As can be
seen in Venezuela, socialism is a flop and in the old Soviet Union so was
Communism so why the intensive hatred of a system that is meant to improve the
lives of those who work? There is no "Utopia", at least not in this
stage of the primitivity and barbarianism exhibited by certain members of
humanity.
The "new" model curriculum addresses
"racism" as a “form of power and oppression.” Historically yes, in
many ways it is, and that is the exact basis of WHY it should be debated and
discussed openly!
As to the authors of the "new" ethnic studies
curriculum to cynically assert that BDS - specifically the Palestinian
motivated BDS pointed at Israel- "IS" a "social movement whose
aim is to achieve freedom through equal rights and justice” is a blatant lie.
The current Palestinian motivated BDS movement is NOT about
"freedom through equal rights and justice" it is a movement designed
to negate the sovereignty and existence of the Jewish State without peace
negotiations.
The cynical insertion of this equivalency is blatant
brainwashing and poisoning of young minds, The Palestinian BDS movement is seen
by Congress and by many countries in the world as anything but a "social
movement" it is seen as an attack towards the legitimacy of one country whose backers are associated
with US designated FTO (Foreign Terrorist Organizations)
The "New ethnic studies curriculum is in dire need of
an overhaul.
The final curriculum should emphasize the deep, disturbing
and complex facts of racial and ethnic history, respecting differences of
opinion, and encouraging open discussion on an often difficult subject but
above ALL else it should teach the students to research and learn the real facts
and truth.
The curriculum is anti-Israel, neglects to include Jews as
an ethnic minority, and promotes aggression against Israel.
No comments:
Post a Comment